
September 8, 2011 | Branding, Design Basics
We are currently in the midst of a large branding project. It started with an analysis of the client’s competitors and target audience and is now in the final stages of logo development and refinement and the beginning phases of the web site design.
As we are refining the logo design, we’ve had some interesting conversations about “What is the best shape for a logo?” And “Is it OK to have multiple versions of your logo?” such as one that is predominantly horizontal and another that is grouped more compactly.
I’m not ready to share the client’s in-progress work, so I will use other examples to illustrate my point.
When I was in design school, we were taught that the ideal shape for a logo is a horizontal rectangle. That doesn’t mean that the actual shape of the logo needs to be a rectangle, but the live area should be like a wide rectangle.


An example of a logo we created that fits the wide proportion, but is not actually a rectangle shape.
This is the normal viewing area for the human eyes, which is why they use it in movie theaters. This format is now becoming more mainstream as TVs and computer monitors are also more commonly created with this widescreen format. That shape can quickly and easily be seen, whereas a more tall & skinny or overly wide format may take longer for the human eye to see and recognize the information.
Nowadays, there are many applications that require a square version of your logo. Favicons, and avatars are two common places where you may need to represent your company or brand with a small, square version of your logo. Some designers are trying to create logos that are specifically square to start with. Other shapes that fit within a square would be a close second choice, such as circles or triangles. They should have the same height and width dimension.

A critical problem (and one for this client project we’re in the middle of) is businesses with long names. In that case, it can be difficult to make a version of the logo that is grouped tightly. If you’re starting from scratch, you may want to consider a short name. There are many benefits to a short and snappy name and one of them is that you’re able to create a very compact logo design.
With a name like Visible Logic I understand the issues!
One company that overcame this issue was FedEx. For years, they fought to be called their full name: Federal Express. But eventually they decided to change to the nickname that everyone was using: FedEx. This opened up a world of opportunity when they rebranded. What started as a weak logo, was redesigned and is now praised as one of the best.

You can see with the FedEx example, that choosing a short brand name can be beneficial. But, it is not the only consideration. The name needs to make sense to people, it needs to have an available domain name, etc. You also may have a company that has successfully been in business for a long time and it doesn’t make sense to shorten your name! (You probably don’t have FedEx’s budget for marketing, nor their promotional opportunities on the sides of trucks and planes across the globe).
Harkening back to design school days again, I remember being told that while a wide rectangle is the ideal shape for a logo, you should always have a version that can fit on the side of a pen. Pens are frequent giveaway items at trade shows and some businesses do rely on this type of promotional item. Nowadays, it’s more common to need a horizontal version within a web site banner or header.
It is reasonable to have more than one version of your logo. You probably already have more than one version— such as a full color version and a black and white or one color version. With careful planning, you should be able to create several, tightly related versions of your logo so that you always have the best fit for the application at hand. Here is an example of both a wide and stacked version of British Airways logo (note there is also no highlight on one version, which might be necessary depending on the application).
Looking around on the web I was also able to find a picture of the British Airways headquarters that had the stacked version, but with white type.
On this page you can see a complete run down of all their planes with the logo applied. It is always the horizontal logo, but the actual placement of the ribbon graphic and the size and relationship between the graphic and type changes based on the physical structure of the plane.
11 comments
Nice post and very good advice. I agree that logo variations are needed but as you stated staying consistent is key. I have seen small business owners have so many variations of their logo it totally looses it’s identity.
In addition to what you have here tall slender logos seem to not fit anywhere nicely. I’ve generally always avoided them.
Brandi, Thanks for chiming in. I agree, it seems that a tall, slender logo is setting yourself up for lots of frustration!
Good advice and flexibility with it. Not something many think about and yet its so important. Funny how we don’t really registar all the logos around us, but our subconscious does and that impact on our decision to buy.
Ahhh.
If only I had seen this earlier! I am in the process of creating my personal logo and am just about finished. But I’ll definitely save this for a future reminder. Thanks for the advice.
It is said that the right proportion, in order of recognition, is 1:2,25. Your eyes individually cover an 1:1 area, if you add 1:0,25 of the area between your eyes you’ll get 1:2,25.
I personally favor the rectangle, but the square one is more usable and ad friendly. Hey! Did you see the arrow in the Fed-Ex logo?
Kristi, Maybe it’s not too late? That was sort of our feeling as we were underway with the client project. But we forced ourselves to reevaluate some things and I think we have a stronger logo.
@Floris, Thanks for that detail. I was looking for the specific numbers that drive the wide screen ratios.
Your very last bullet about consistency is absolutely critical. I agree with you that’s it’s ok to have a few variations of your logo, but the exact colors used, fonts, and scale of design aspects should be consistent across media.
I’ve seen one small company lose control of their logo and ended up with one version in baby blue, one in navy blue, and one in between (and these were not variations of design) and it looks very unprofessional.
Nice post. Don’t forget to create logo guidelines.
You are absolutely right that shapes do matter in logo designing. I will say infect logo designing is the name give shapes to text and images. So shape is the most important thing in logo designing field.
Trackbacks